|
|||||||||
|
Home | Forums | Register | Gallery | FAQ | Calendar |
Retailers | Community | News/Info | International Retailers | IRC | Today's Posts |
|
Thread Tools |
July 4th, 2008, 17:10 | #1 |
Nice Guy
|
MP5 Mag comparison - Kings Arms and TM
I came across these
Kings Arms MP5 mags http://cgi.ebay.com/MAG-MP5-Mid-Cap-...QQcmdZViewItem And The TM MP5 Mags http://cgi.ebay.com/Marui-MP5-Airsof...QQcmdZViewItem I am guessing you all will say the TM mags are better? Or has anyone ever used Kings Arms before? |
July 4th, 2008, 17:18 | #2 |
King Arms mags are generally pretty good. Had some feeding issues with my KA M4 mags but that was solved with some silicone oil and god old fashioned repeated loading and unloading of the mags.
__________________
I'm not dead yet! But pretty damn close... |
|
July 4th, 2008, 17:36 | #3 |
Are KA and MAG the same thing? In any case KA M4 mags can be a bit sketchy if you don't take care of them. I have to tape mine to get them to feed properly. I would wait for someone with actual experience with the MP5 mags though. The price is great for 8 mags.
__________________
JG HK416 KWA USP |
|
July 4th, 2008, 18:50 | #4 |
That is a great price, I would go with KA. I have 2 Ebaybanned Hicaps and 2 unknown lowcaps, they all sucked at feeding in my Aftermath MP5, and they are all perfect with my ICS. I did tape them for added insurance, but I wouldn't worry about it. For less than $7 a mag, you can't go wrong.
Jeff
__________________
Founder of Capital Airsoft in Edmonton Out of the Game 04/22/16 |
|
July 4th, 2008, 20:09 | #5 |
KingArms makes killer product. Can't really miss with anything of theirs.
__________________
Semper memor. |
|
July 4th, 2008, 20:25 | #6 |
I have 3 KA MP5 midcaps, and I've had no feeding issues in my JG MP5. They feed just as reliably as my 3 TM midcaps.
I also have a box of metal KA M4 mags and haven't had an issue in any of my guns with them. I also have a box of plastic AK mags, and haven't had any feed issues with them in my RS Type 56 or my old Double Eagle AK47. IMO, they're a really good product for the price and worth the money.
__________________
|
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|