|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| Home | Forums | Register | Gallery | FAQ | Calendar |
| Retailers | Community | News/Info | International Retailers | IRC | Today's Posts |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools |
March 5th, 2008, 08:45
|
#1 |
|
TM m14 vs CA m14
I know this has probably been done befor but anyways when i finaly am able to get an airsoft gun or get my dad to get one under his name, is there any huge diference in the terms of acuracy in either moddle? the main reason is that i noticed that 007 airsoft didnt have the CA listed and that was my first choice thanks
|
|
|
|
March 5th, 2008, 08:57
|
#2 | |
|
Although i've never handled both I have owned the TM and its one kick ass AEG. Can't go wrong with that baby.
__________________
 "Were not that good... Everybody else just sucks" Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 5th, 2008, 09:06
|
#3 |
|
|
It does use a large typ battery corect? That besides the full metal part is my other main wory with geting an AEG
|
|
|
|
|
March 5th, 2008, 09:08
|
#4 | |
|
|
Yup it can house a large type. I don't know if you want the M14 to be full metal lol Its rather heavy as it is!
__________________
"Were not that good... Everybody else just sucks" Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 5th, 2008, 09:24
|
#5 |
|
TM M14 is impressive. Great range and accuracy on stock. And upgraded is GOD
__________________
Perdona bonita, pero yo solo hablo dos idiomas: normal y con tacos |
|
|
|
|
March 5th, 2008, 09:26
|
#6 |
|
Schwag wannabe
|
The TM takes the cake.
|
|
|
|
|
March 5th, 2008, 09:45
|
#7 |
|
formerly Sepulcrum
|
CA has a frankenmechbox TM FYW.
|
|
|
|
|
March 5th, 2008, 09:47
|
#8 | ||
|
|
Quote:
__________________
"Were not that good... Everybody else just sucks" Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
March 5th, 2008, 10:03
|
#9 |
|
did you try checking A&A as well, they have TM, CA, & AGM m14s but, only the wood version is instock cause A&A is go to stop selling airsoft soon.
|
|
|
|
|
March 5th, 2008, 16:42
|
#10 |
|
They're both good guns, TM being the better build as the CA is based off of the G&G. I own a CA and mechbox work is easy as pie and haven't had any reliability issues other then the trigger being sketchy and not always engaging to fire fully.
__________________
www.jeepcentral.ca |
|
|
|
|
March 5th, 2008, 20:10
|
#11 |
|
A huge factor with airsoft guns is replacement or upgrade parts, in that area CA cannot hold a candle to TM. I have owned a G&G and TM and have handled a CA, if you buy anything except for a TM you will be disappointed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 5th, 2008, 20:15
|
#12 |
|
|
I agree, but take a look at this CA M14
http://www.airsoftcanada.com/showthr...ight=m14+match Upgraded to the tits
__________________
www.jeepcentral.ca |
|
|
|
|
March 5th, 2008, 21:01
|
#13 | |
|
Quote:
Any gun can be upgraded to the tits, I'll take a TM ver.7 mechbox over some G&G/CA frankenbox anyday. Every single part in a TM M14 you can get replacements for either original or aftermarket, can you say the same about CA or G&G? They have too many proprietary parts that aftermarket parts manufacturers wont touch and the original manufacturers wont sell separately. |
||
|
|
|
|
March 5th, 2008, 21:11
|
#14 |
|
|
Didn't mean to burst your bubble there. TM is great and all but what do you expect from a gun that was copied from shit. If it shoots as good as a TM and does what I want it to then how is there a problem? I can get anything I need to fix it if something breaks.
If I was to buy a new one i'd obviously go TM.. but for people who are looking for a more cost effective situation whats wrong with getting a cheaper used CA and spending a few dollars or even just a few man hours to get it working perfect.
__________________
www.jeepcentral.ca |
|
|
|
|
March 5th, 2008, 21:35
|
#15 |
|
|
So basicaly TM better of the start but more $$ CA is cheeper but can be upgraded later to the same standared if i want to save in the begining?
|
|
|
|
 |
|
||||||
| Bookmarks |
|
|
 |
|
