|
|||||||||
|
Home | Forums | Register | Gallery | FAQ | Calendar |
Retailers | Community | News/Info | International Retailers | IRC | Today's Posts |
|
Thread Tools |
January 3rd, 2012, 17:25 | #1 |
RA-Tech Steel Mk23
http://en.ratech.com.tw/product/html...ork_ksc007.php
Not quite Inokatsu 1911 price, but I am pretty sure this shoots better.... This is after their many Glock and USP releases. Not a fan of their Glock slide as the engraving looks a bit goofy, but their H&K stuff seems more accurate to the real gun... |
|
January 3rd, 2012, 18:04 | #2 |
GBB Whisperer
|
I've shot a few RA-Tech upgraded steel pieces, and they generally shoot like crap (very sluggish compared to what I'd consider to be "optimal").
I can't see this shooting better than the Inokatsu 1911, considering the Ino 1911 has a propellent source that has a psi that is 5 times more powerful to move a slide that's just as heavy. |
January 3rd, 2012, 18:54 | #3 |
I dunno....this looks pretty good...
KSC MK23 with RA Steel Slide 7 Barrel - YouTube Original thread posted: http://www.arms-cool.net/forum/thread-106283-1-1.html 12kg Propane, the same stuff we have here, the OP has done some polishing to the slide rail and frame rail. And he changed around the recoil springs.... Last edited by RacingManiac; January 3rd, 2012 at 18:58.. |
|
January 3rd, 2012, 19:01 | #4 |
GBB Whisperer
|
That does look pretty good
|
January 3rd, 2012, 19:12 | #5 |
However, there is a significant drop in FPS when fitted with the steel slide, as sown in their own video : RA-TECH KSC MK23 STEEL SLIDE & WE AK74U WOOD KIT - YouTube.
I know you don't need massive amounts of FPS on a pistol, but going from 350ish to sub 290 sure is a lot. In 3 shots : 274, 285 and 264. 20 fps in variation. The kick on it looks insane though. |
|
January 3rd, 2012, 21:29 | #6 | |
formerly Contractor 6-8, CptPinard17eRAM
|
Quote:
__________________
Retired chairsofter |
|
January 3rd, 2012, 21:35 | #7 | |
Quote:
http://kwausa.com/products/gbb/hk-mk23-ussocom/ |
||
January 3rd, 2012, 21:47 | #8 | |
Quote:
__________________
Friends don't let friends use highcaps. |
||
January 3rd, 2012, 21:56 | #9 | |
Quote:
That's why it's "advised" to upgrade to high-flow valves for magazines. |
||
January 3rd, 2012, 22:21 | #10 |
Arms-Cool post in Chinese(along with the first Youtube video), also mentioned that while RA-Tech provides the "150%" spring for the recoil spring, its still not strong enough for the heavy slide. So the OP in that thread found a combination of springs available to him that upped the rate more. The RA-Tech's own vid you can kinda see the the sluggish nature of it...
Also RA-Tech's vid doesn't exactly state the the BBs used or the the temperature....in Taiwan they don't exactly use central heating in winter, it can be 15-20 C indoor... Heavy slide should not affect outright FPS of the gun, but it may well affect shot to shot power as the gas reservoir size is limited(MK23 though does have a big mag), and heavier slide takes more gas to cycle(after the BB has been expelled), which will have more cool down, and more % variance in reservoir pressure.... |
|
January 3rd, 2012, 22:46 | #11 | |
Quote:
|
||
January 3rd, 2012, 23:23 | #12 |
Didn't hear the weight, rewatched it and heard he said .2 bb....
|
|
January 3rd, 2012, 23:27 | #13 |
I have a KWA mk23 and saw these steel upgrades. I may go with the barrel but will stick with the stock slide for now. Gas consumtion on these things is pretty damn good. You can rapid fire the whole mag no problem.
|
|
January 4th, 2012, 01:38 | #14 | |
Quote:
at 15C it will cycle and lock back if magazine only have 15-20 (cool down issue) at 20C or higher it will cycle and lock back with a 25 rounder magazine easily HFC134a will not work to cycle the gun The USP match video shown is using stock recoil spring AFAIK Using Stock spring... -Cycling is sluggish when shooting parallel to the ground -Cycling/racking can have a failure to return to battery if its perpendicular to the ground Using Shooter Design 150% recoil spring and buffer spring... -Cycling is not as crisp as stock slide, but ROF is the same between the two slide (stock slide & spring vs upgrade slide & spring) -Cycling/racking is pretty sluggish if its use perpendicular to the ground Using H&K USP 9mm/40S&W recoil spring with stock buffer spring... -racking is extremely crisp...big surprise -spring is so tense it does NOT chamber the next round when cycling -cutting off 6 coils (a coil is define by having the spring complete 360 degree rotation) will give you a recoil spring that can has a crisp cycling much like stock H&K USP 9mm/40S&W spring but it can chamber the next round. However, it does NOT lock-back and it is possible to have the gun 1-2mm out of battery if you point the barrel perpendicular to the ground facing the sky. ---> USP .45 spring probably is more tense since the slide is heavier, that is why I chose USP 9mm spring In short, RA-Tech steel slide Stock spring is not enough 150% spring will give you back about 80% of the stock crisp cycling H&K USP 9mm/40S&W is too much even if you cut down the coil to the bare minimum PS: I HATE YOU KSC! KSC's USP .45 IS NOT base on USP .45 the frame, magazine dimension are base of USP 9mm/40S&W. This is ID through USP .45 base plate being wider than KSC's USP .45. |
||
|
Bookmarks |
|
|