|
|||||||||
|
Home | Forums | Register | Gallery | FAQ | Calendar |
Retailers | Community | News/Info | International Retailers | IRC | Today's Posts |
|
Thread Tools |
July 23rd, 2009, 12:44 | #1 |
hfc beretta m190 WHAT DO YOU THINK??
HI
I want to know what do you think about the HFC Beretta m190 full metal GBB. Because i want to buy some kjw glock32c but i see a couple of review on google said HFC is superior at KJW. The HFC berrata is a clone of the Marui??? For the spare part i think it better because the kjw part seem to be hard to find. thank guy |
|
July 23rd, 2009, 13:26 | #2 |
HFC seems to be on thier own boat. Although i find amost every GBB is loosely based on KSC or TM internal design, im pretty sure HFC is good at engineering their own designs.
My first GBB was the HFC m190. I loved it. good heavy gun, felt like a hand cannon on full auto. HFC is IMO, far superior to KJW, as they use slightly higher quality metal parts and tighter tolerances. I would choose HFC over KJW any day. |
|
July 23rd, 2009, 14:07 | #3 |
thank diamond
and to find part when it broken it easy??????? Last edited by SGT_Blaster; July 23rd, 2009 at 14:10.. Reason: missing word |
|
July 23rd, 2009, 14:20 | #4 |
It was an OK gun, mostly pot metal with a weird grey finish that I wasn't crazy about. Yes, it's heavy, but HFC's quality control is shady at best. Mine continually jammed, ejecting bb's out the top of the chamber (!) at times. Turns out the inner barrel was taped together by somebody in the factory... they didn't think anyone would notice this cut corner, I guess. Not at all impressed by this gun.
On the other hand, HFC makes a Glock 17 which I found to be a much better gun. |
|
July 23rd, 2009, 14:28 | #5 |
Official ASC "Dumb Ass"
|
get the Glock man, that HFC is crap compared to it, the metal quality is very very poor
__________________
|
July 23rd, 2009, 14:33 | #6 |
I've seen 3 HFC M9s (2 auto, 1 semi) basically disintegrate after very little use. One of the autos slide broke. The other still works, but tends to be constantly be problematic. The semi version had the slide and various other internals break on it. PM Talraga about it. The 2 full auto versions I saw are his. When they work, they work well, but doesn't seem to be a consistent thing wiht them.
The only thing I consider better about HFC than the KJW is that the mag catch is metal instead of plastic. That's a part that wears out quickly on the KJW. I don't know what design it's compatible with, TM or KJW. What I do know though is that I can take the whole slide and upper assembly off my KJW M9 and it fits and fires fine, however the HFC upper won't function properly on the KJW lower frame.
__________________
|
|
July 23rd, 2009, 14:37 | #7 |
July 23rd, 2009, 14:42 | #8 |
Official ASC "Dumb Ass"
|
if ur comparing the KJW glock 23 or 32 to the HFC M190, the glock is ten times better, I've used all 3 guns and the quality of the HFC is garbage, as Crunch said, the slides on the auto versions break all the time, trigger bars break as well.
look at their resale values in the classifieds, KJ's retain more value than HFC most of the time. KJ has always been better than HFC, even the HFC glocks are garbage, with plastic spring guides in some versions etc.
__________________
|
July 23rd, 2009, 14:47 | #9 |
ok good thank guy for your answer
|
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|