A non-clear AEG you can import with no hassles:

[Rumpel Felt]

...........only in Canada would a toy replica of a hangun over a hundred years old be considered a dangerous weapon of mass destruction prohibited for import by suspected terrorists.

[burningashes]

Originally Posted by The Saint

My local gun store has all its muzzle loading pistols listed as restricted.

Could depend on wether they take smokeless powder cuz they will be restricted if they are modified to take smokeless powder.

[kalnaren]

Do want

[mcguyver]

Originally Posted by burningashes

Could depend on wether they take smokeless powder cuz they will be restricted if they are modified to take smokeless powder.

No. Smokelss or black powder makes no difference.

[Hades]

Originally Posted by Ayashifx55

I think that could be really cool. Pirate theme. Head wraps. Wooden leg. Flying ropes. Monkeys. Beers & Wenches

fixed

[PuNk]

Originally Posted by Rumpel Felt

...........only in Canada would a toy replica of a hangun over a hundred years old be considered a dangerous weapon of mass destruction prohibited for import by suspected terrorists.

lol indeed...

[Doombringer]

Their argument would be: It could be used as a weapon for a crime.

Right...

[Latvian291]

Originally Posted by mcguyver

No. Smokelss or black powder makes no difference.

It doesn't. Modern reproductions of flintlock pistols are restricted due to barrel length. This has nothing to do with airsoft guns or the ban on replica firearms.

The CBSA seizes airsoft on the basis that they are replicas of MODERN firearms. Replicas of pre-1898 firearms, no matter when they were made, are not regulated nor are they covered by the firearms act or the replica firearms ban. Only real guns are.

[ShelledPants]

Originally Posted by Doombringer

Their argument would be: It could be used as a weapon for a crime.

Right...

Dude, I don't know about you, but if some fucker held me up with a flintlock, I shit bricks.

[Neil_N]

Originally Posted by ShelledPants

Dude, I don't know about you, but if some fucker held me up with a flintlock, I shit bricks.

That would be a big f$#King hole to fix.

[Gunny_McSmith]

read on Arnies, that it only shoots at 0.4J = 211 fps (with .20g) (but has a adjustable hopup!)

BTW: but can't wait to see the face of someone getting hit by this XD

[skalnok]

the perfect one shot backup weapon lol

[mcguyver]

Originally Posted by Submachinehead

It doesn't. Modern reproductions of flintlock pistols are restricted due to barrel length. This has nothing to do with airsoft guns or the ban on replica firearms.

The CBSA seizes airsoft on the basis that they are replicas of MODERN firearms. Replicas of pre-1898 firearms, no matter when they were made, are not regulated nor are they covered by the firearms act or the replica firearms ban. Only real guns are.

Yes, thanks for coming out.

The regulations for a muzzle loader have nothing to do with smokeless or black powder. I can buy both, no PAL required, and fire both in a muzzle loader if I want.

The dividing line would be Jan 1, 1898. A BP pistol made Dec 31, 1897 would be perfectly legal, in fact, not even regulated per se. The exact same make and model of pistol made 1 day later would be restricted or prohibited. It could even have been made on the same machinery by the same worker. But a line has to be drawn with precision somewhere.

If I bought a BP pistol, the date of manufacture would be used to detremine whether I could legally possess it, shoot it, transport it, etc.

Easy way around this. Find a handgun that has a date of manufacture prior to 1897 stamped on it, and make sure the replica has it stamped as well. The definition of replica specifically excludes copies of proscribed antiques.

Simple.

[TokyoSeven]

I wonder if a blunderbuss model is available.

[pusangani]

yar many-a-time a brace of pistols has saved me noggin