|
|||||||||
|
Home | Forums | Register | Gallery | FAQ | Calendar |
Retailers | Community | News/Info | International Retailers | IRC | Today's Posts |
|
Thread Tools |
February 17th, 2007, 10:11 | #1 |
Banned
|
Does anyone use Classic Army bb showers/grenades?
I am looking at buying a CA 120 round bb shower for my AG36 launcher and I was just wondering if this was a good grenade or not. According to the research i've done all grenades have there good and bad points and none are far superior to the rest. Does anyone own one of these or have any info regarding it? I havent been able to find any reviews for the CA grenades.
Thanks in advance for any help which you can give me. |
February 17th, 2007, 16:36 | #2 |
I've used 90rnd King Arms shells, 165rnd CA shells, and the 120rnd CA shells. All times I used these was to test and I never used any on the field. The 120rnd shells can be a bit harder to load with BB's because of the rounded nose but also because of the rounded nose they are easier to load into 40mm launcher tubes. The button on the back of the 120rnd CA shells to rest the gas valve once its been fired are far more consistent than the other two types I've tried and you just have to press it in with the back of a pen or something, no unscrewing the cap one full rotation until it clicks. The material of all the shells was similar, the finish was similar even though the 120rnd shells have all the groves and ridges all over them where as the others are smooth.
Overall I choose round nosed shells any day because of how much easier it is to load the shells into the tube. |
|
February 18th, 2007, 01:35 | #3 |
Hey Lut,
Any truth in the saying that KA shells shoot further?
__________________
Maybe you'll find someone else to help you. Maybe black mesa... THAT WAS A JOKE, ha ha, fat chance. My Buy/Sell 1337ness rating |
|
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
|
|