For those that still doubt that Law Enfrocement trolls discussion boards...

Originally Posted by Debbie

I am sure your bosses don't read ASC then, or you would be stuck in the mailroom. I have never seen anyone with such a Napoleon complex in my life. That is a little man who means nothing, who lauds over all with his opinions. Who cares how old you are, age does not always mean a thing.....life experience does mean something, but man you live in your own little world.....where you are king. What you are is King of the little people, people who know nothing and hide behind you because they think you speak for these boards. In the eyes of another much older adult you are simply pathetic....there are alot of "Cliffies" (ever watch Cheers) out there, you are in the club. My God trying to impress people with your security clearance.....you act like a 12 year old. People who have security clearances that matter DO NOT discuss it...end of story. Christ you work in Ottawa, everyone has a clearance level......you are nothing special so please please, for the love of God wake up.

textbook ASC Infraction.
Where is the "Insulted Other Member(s) - Play nice or shut up."?

[Scarecrow]

I still say this would all be solved if we came up with a secret ASC handshake.

[CDN_Stalker]

[Dirty Deeds]

Originally Posted by Scarecrow

I still say this would all be solved if we came up with a secret ASC handshake.

LMAO!

[Ibby]

Originally Posted by Scarecrow

I still say this would all be solved if we came up with a secret ASC handshake.

Yeah, we should use this:

[Greylocks]

Digital, dear god, you need to breathe and relax.

I tried to use a simple example that is prerequisite to getting specific answers.

You went nuts because I did not mention the 'need to know' clause? Dear god lad...

I can talk about a monitoring station; it's no secret that it's there, it's even on record that it's there IF you do some research. It's not the only one. Heck, you can drive right through it and unless you are blind and clueless it's right in your face. You can drive right by two (obvious) more just in the Ottawa city limits.

Same as for the JTF2 barracks; what they do and where they are at any given moment IS Top Secret. Where their barracks are is not. Knowing that reveals nothing. Talking about what a neat looking place it is reveals nothing. Speculating as to where they are currently is just talk, but you can talk about them.

It's called freedom of expression, and it's fine as long as it reveals nothing secret to anyone not allowed to know about it.

It's amazing what Google can find IF you use it properly. Pictures of these places can be seen clearly.

For the rest, I commend you on your attentiveness to the security of Canada but you badly need to refocus on far more important targets than comments made on a forum.

Debbie; I can look at anything I please while at work as long as it breaches no laws or internal code of conduct, just like anyone else.
If my work requires that I look at anything coming from your IP address, I will, or others will.
If in return someone wants to dig into my information, they can, and they will.

Welcome to the reality of how open forums, or the internet, works.

[Scarecrow]

Originally Posted by Greylocks

Debbie; I can look at anything I please while at work as long as it breaches no laws or internal code of conduct, just like anyone else.

Gotta love that open-p0rn policy... who needs national security when you got the Ron Jeremy all you can download website for 4.95USD...

CDN_Stalker, you sick fuck you made my week...

[DuffMan]

Originally Posted by Kid

Quick question for the police, do you monitor EVERY post?

No.

I mean, I like Mansex.

EDIT: HOLY FREAKIN CRAP. Ron Jeremy freaks the SHITE out of me.

I give up.

Next time I think about posting something informative, I'll skip it.

[Greylocks]

Here's a test; google your own name and nicknames. See what comes up just with that, fully available to the public. It can be educational.

[Ibby]

Good goin' Scarecrow

[Scarecrow]

Originally Posted by Greylocks

Here's a test; google your own name and nicknames. See what comes up just with that, fully available to the public. It can be educational.

click here to see larger image
ScareCrow® automatic outdoor animal deterrent $89.00

Ships within 24 hours
Protect your yard, fruit trees, vegetables, flowers and water features from hungry or destructive animal intruders. The ScareCrow® motion-activated sprinkler automatically detects deer, racoons, heron, dogs and more as they approach, and repels them with a short but startling burst of water. The sudden noise, movement and spray scares animals away, teaching them to avoid the area in future.
Keep animals away from your pond or garden with a harmless blast of water
ScareCrow

• works day and night without chemicals or unsightly barriers
• can be linked to other ScareCrows to form an effective water barrier
• conserves water - uses just 2 to 3 cups per deterrence
• operates for up to six months on a single nine-volt battery
• one scarecrow covers approximately 1200 sq. ft.

ScareCrow® Mounting Bracket $15.00

Ships within 24 hours
For installing the ScareCrow on fences, posts or walls, use the optional ScareCrow mounting bracket.

[Scarecrow]

Holy shyte, the interweb has me cold. I don't think I like being edumakated. Fuckin' Blue Herons.

Originally Posted by Ibby

Good goin' Scarecrow

whooooo.... me?

... and for a limited time only....



click here to see larger image
Mini ScareCrow® automatic pet deterrent$49.00

Ships within 24 hours Mini ScareCrow® Refill Can


Uses just 2 to 3 cups per deterrence, one scarecrow covers approximately 1200 sq. ft... man I rock!

[Lisa]

I googled my full name (since googling my first name and asc name would be rather silly)... nothing....

while my last name isn't common as say smith, it is still fairly common and my first name? one of the more common names you'll run into, at work in my department there's 5 Lisa's... It's a popular name.

[Greylocks]

Depending on your name, it works well or not. But it is a method used with common tools.

Besides Lisa, you already said that this site was monitored based on the connecting IP addresses. I dont know what more proof people need.