m14 gbb

DarkAngel · January 25th, 2010, 12:09

If a reputable quality company made this, such as WA or G&P, Id pick one up. IMO GBBR's are something you dont want to cheap out on parts with. That and if it was G&P, Part would be readily availiable.

G&P Im lookin at you.

RacingManiac · January 25th, 2010, 12:22

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarkAngel

If a reputable quality company made this, such as WA or G&P, Id pick one up. IMO GBBR's are something you dont want to cheap out on parts with. That and if it was G&P, Part would be readily availiable.

G&P Im lookin at you.

Quote:

Originally Posted by RacingManiac

FYI WE have confirmed this is their prototype. It is to be their first "fully open chamber" GBBR(ie, less the brass tube). Their goal is to develop version of this type of design with other WE GBBR as well(ie, the M4, SCAR, and PDW), while retaining mag compatibility.

Crunchmeister · January 25th, 2010, 12:32

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Saint

I wouldn't bet on that.

Please elaborate then...

AngelusNex · January 25th, 2010, 12:37

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Saint

I wouldn't bet on that.

Crunch put real evidence there my friend, CBSA has very little understanding with their own laws, they let in those hicapas. THOUGH they MAY now be more careful as they eventually caught onto the hicapas.

The Saint · January 25th, 2010, 13:28

Yes, CBSA has very little internal firearm expertise, but that's why they ask the RCMP. The RCMP has plenty of expertise and they're more than happy to share.

Relying on LE's ignorance is a bad policy.

DarkAngel · January 25th, 2010, 13:54

Quote:

Originally Posted by RacingManiac

WE is not a reputable Quality Manufacturer.

Crunchmeister · January 25th, 2010, 13:56

Well, one can't rely on their ignorance. However, it's been shown that CBSA agents often have problems interpreting their own policy correctly (allowing stuff in that shouldn't, and equally seizing items that are legal to import). This is all I was saying.

RacingManiac · January 25th, 2010, 14:05

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarkAngel

WE is not a reputable Quality Manufacturer.

While thats true, THIS One is WE....

KoolAidMan · January 25th, 2010, 14:13

Quote:

Originally Posted by RacingManiac

While thats true, THIS One is WE....

clearly it can be noted that we is constantly improving there product thought they take alot of user feedback , thought they could use improvement its better then most companys

DarkAngel · January 25th, 2010, 14:33

Quote:

Originally Posted by KoolAidMan

clearly it can be noted that we is constantly improving there product thought they take alot of user feedback , thought they could use improvement its better then most companys

They can start with their materials and QC.
Theyve known this for ages, they just arnt doing anything about it.

Taking feedback is cheap, doing something about it is expensive.
Untill then, I dont care how "responsive" they are to feedback, it doesnt mean shit till they do something about it.

RacingManiac · January 25th, 2010, 14:34

I don't mind it personally. The couple of the WE M4 I've shot kicks nice, and shoots accurate enough. I just wouldn't use their M4 since I am waist-deep in the WA M4 that I might as well stick with stuff that uses its mag(ie, GHK PDW and such). But a WE M14, I am all for that, since I'll need new mags and everything for it anyway, if I were to buy one. Same deal if they were to make a SR-25/M110, or SCAR-H. According the the WE person's reply on Arnies, they are looking into making different variants of the M14s, so should be an interesting line when it shows up...

KoolAidMan · January 25th, 2010, 15:09

apparently WE is switching to the brassless system seen in this m14 so there coming out with a kit to convert there guns to a a more WA type system using the same mags

El Cactus Loco · January 25th, 2010, 17:02

Quote:

Originally Posted by RacingManiac

FYI WE have confirmed this is their prototype. It is to be their first "fully open chamber" GBBR(ie, less the brass tube). Their goal is to develop version of this type of design with other WE GBBR as well(ie, the M4, SCAR, and PDW), while retaining mag compatibility.

linky? i havent heard anything about this. further more, that goes completely against the pics we have already seen of the WE M14 that show that it has the brass tube.

as seen hur:
clickkkkkk

Thenooblord · February 9th, 2010, 23:28

if you read, it was already posted that this was WE

Gunny_McSmith · February 9th, 2010, 23:45

Quote:

Originally Posted by El Cactus Loco

linky? i havent heard anything about this. further more, that goes completely against the pics we have already seen of the WE M14 that show that it has the brass tube.

as seen hur:
clickkkkkk

i dont want to be a slut..... But look at the date of the post on your link...."august 2009"...... In 5 month a prototype can be totally changed..... So basically, your link is just outdated....

Seems like WE has moved to a "brass less" generation of gbbr!

Home	Forums	Register	Gallery	FAQ	Calendar
Retailers	Community	News/Info	International Retailers	IRC	Today's Posts

British Columbia	Alberta
BCAC	EAR
Op-For	JOC
Northern Arms Airsoft	Skunkworx Airsoft
Airsoft Kelowna	RAAT
Prince George Airsoft	Manitoba
Saskatchewan	MAA
SK Airsoft	Ontario
PDW	Airsoft Ottawa
South Sask Mercs	Snow Dragons
Quebec	1st Ranger Platoon
PQAC	Wolfpack Tactical
1st Pathfinders Regiment	TTAC3
Quebec Airsoft
MTX Airsoft	Atlantic
FAQc	Atlantic Airsoft

January 25th, 2010, 12:09	#31
DarkAngel * Age Verifier status suspended * Trader rating Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Scarborough	If a reputable quality company made this, such as WA or G&P, Id pick one up. IMO GBBR's are something you dont want to cheap out on parts with. That and if it was G&P, Part would be readily availiable. G&P Im lookin at you. __________________ Certified Sniper Clinic Instructor and Counter Sniper Sentinel Arms Customs - Specializing In Unique, One of a kind guns

January 25th, 2010, 13:28	#35
The Saint Trader rating Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Quebec	Yes, CBSA has very little internal firearm expertise, but that's why they ask the RCMP. The RCMP has plenty of expertise and they're more than happy to share. Relying on LE's ignorance is a bad policy. __________________ "The Bird of Hermes is My Name, Eating My Wings to Make Me Tame."

January 25th, 2010, 13:56	#37
Crunchmeister Trader rating Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: In your bedroom going though your underwear drawer	Well, one can't rely on their ignorance. However, it's been shown that CBSA agents often have problems interpreting their own policy correctly (allowing stuff in that shouldn't, and equally seizing items that are legal to import). This is all I was saying. __________________

January 25th, 2010, 14:34	#41
RacingManiac Trader rating Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Canada/US	I don't mind it personally. The couple of the WE M4 I've shot kicks nice, and shoots accurate enough. I just wouldn't use their M4 since I am waist-deep in the WA M4 that I might as well stick with stuff that uses its mag(ie, GHK PDW and such). But a WE M14, I am all for that, since I'll need new mags and everything for it anyway, if I were to buy one. Same deal if they were to make a SR-25/M110, or SCAR-H. According the the WE person's reply on Arnies, they are looking into making different variants of the M14s, so should be an interesting line when it shows up... __________________ My Arnies' Album My PBase Album Custom Pistol Whore...

m14 gbb

Airsoft Guns Discussion