September 1st, 2008, 13:52 | #16 |
I could see these being a hot commodity out here.
|
|
September 1st, 2008, 14:23 | #17 |
The CF version is much nicer. In fact I think this is frickin ugly. Woowoo the design is not even appealing.
__________________
WOLFPACK |
|
September 1st, 2008, 14:26 | #18 |
Do Want! Do Want!
|
|
September 2nd, 2008, 15:02 | #19 |
That's a sexy body.
|
|
September 2nd, 2008, 15:23 | #20 |
yeah I prefer my Canadian forces C8 body lol
This one is boring where's the maple leaf |
|
September 2nd, 2008, 16:12 | #21 | |
* AV Status REVOKED *
|
Quote:
Would also work as a body for a British used C8 (not the L119A1).
__________________
|
|
September 2nd, 2008, 17:06 | #22 |
not as nice as the Guarders
|
|
September 2nd, 2008, 17:15 | #23 |
Looks like the newer non-military Colt Canada trades rather than the older Diemaco / CF trades. Still a nice body, and I'm sure of top quality too. However, I'd also rather get the CF model. Without the CF trades and maple leaf, it's just an M4, regardless that the receiver says C8A1.
__________________
|
|
September 2nd, 2008, 18:03 | #24 | |
GabeGuitarded
|
^ Same reason I'm not interested
__________________
Quote:
|
|
September 13th, 2008, 12:39 | #25 |
I have the New-Gen Guarder one coming for my kustom C8 project. Can I cut the back to make it a B type for wiring to the stock?
__________________
To save the trouble of Ancorp reading it in every post: Inokatsu |
|
September 14th, 2008, 17:22 | #26 |
September 14th, 2008, 17:37 | #27 |
September 14th, 2008, 17:40 | #28 |
And a wiring hole.
|
|
October 1st, 2008, 08:01 | #29 |
I got one.
|
|
October 1st, 2008, 08:05 | #30 |
Dibs on the Diemaco receiver.
|
|
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
|
|