August 29th, 2007, 13:48 | #16 |
kos
|
That's referring to...? All TMs, or all GBB in general. If that's referring to ALL GBB,you haven't fired many WAs
|
August 29th, 2007, 14:12 | #17 |
GBB Whisperer
|
I've fired WAs... and the performance was... lacking, in comparison to a TM.
|
August 29th, 2007, 14:17 | #18 |
kos
|
|
August 29th, 2007, 14:37 | #19 |
another question, would that rear sight fit on other slide or just kimbers in particular? I don't seem to find a fixed rear sight like that for Hi-Capa(or just not know what I am looking for)...
|
|
August 29th, 2007, 15:05 | #20 |
btw, I took a look at my "OPS-MRP" SD slide(black) and it does have a groove there, is that the only feature distinquishing a bushing capable slide vs a non-capable ones? If that is the case then is the SD bushing set and a straight barrel is all that I need to convert the setup?
|
|
August 29th, 2007, 15:42 | #21 |
kimbers have a proprietary sight cut that is different from all other 1911 makers; there is a "combat sight" by nineball for the bomar cut, but it looks like shit
technically, all sights will "fit" but you'll just have weird gaps if the slide isnt cut for it you'll need a SD chamber as well to go with the straight barrel which WA is that kos? of all the WA's that I have fired/owned, I can say the kick, finish, FPS, and the accuracy at short ranges is better than TM, but the accuracy at range just doesnt comapre to a TM, Ive used MGC, SCW1, SCW2, and a magna on the SCW3 system I use my pistols as primary guns in the field, so I need my guns to at least go toe to toe with a stock aeg accuracy and range wise |
|
August 29th, 2007, 16:12 | #22 | |
kos
|
Quote:
290 on duster, and 1(sometimes less) inch grouping at 40+ feet. I've fired Magna (prePV Beretta from '01), S.C.W3 Shorty, and SVIX 5/4.3. All looked better(fit/finish), were more solid, and kicked harder than any TM. To say that a TM can compete with a WA, is like saying a TM can compete with a PTW. It can't. Not out of the box anyway. Anyway, do you happen to know if that "finger fits" grip you have, is compatible with WA? It looks too damn good, and my grip is soo chewed up from hard reloads.. >_< Kinda looks like the end of a anxious person's pen. Last edited by Lakonian; August 29th, 2007 at 16:15.. |
|
August 29th, 2007, 17:07 | #23 |
yeah, I had pretty much the same experience with a full sized SCW SVI
the shots after 50-60 feet or so would be more likely to wing off in one direction compared to a TM I hate the pre scw3 hop and reed system with my prior TM hicapa setup I could shoot people from 75-100 feet all the time, and further shots are possible if the target is stationary I would say they are not compatible, not without a dremel anyway I looked into replacing a hicapa grip with a WA one a while back; WA has a checkering that is more aggressive =/ |
|
August 29th, 2007, 17:44 | #24 | |
Quote:
Last edited by RacingManiac; August 29th, 2007 at 17:47.. |
||
August 30th, 2007, 02:04 | #25 | |
GBB Whisperer
|
Quote:
Yes, that groove is the only defining feature retarding potential bushing compatibility. |
|
August 30th, 2007, 02:14 | #26 | |
kos
|
Quote:
WA's checkering is very nice. See, if you notice my WA's grip, is has that shitty SVI "rubberized" grip. See, WA forgot to rubberize it, so it just slips outta yer hand when sweaty! Hmm.. Do you think that grip is worth the gamble? Does it feel as good as it looks? |
|
August 30th, 2007, 03:46 | #27 | |
Quote:
=p hm its not bad; the side panels definitely give the gun a much better hold the front cross-hatching isnt as deep as I would like, but its not a huge deal the tac grip does change the feel of the gun somewhat; kind of feels like a beretta if you fire it from the weaver; and definitely more comfortable shooting from isosceles SD I believe makes replacement grips for the WA 2011's might give that a shot if you want a more agressive checkering |
||
August 31st, 2007, 21:04 | #28 |
NAAZ's #1 fan!
|
Would those meu grips fit on a hi-capa 4.3?
Last edited by hattrick; August 31st, 2007 at 21:11.. |
August 31st, 2007, 22:19 | #29 |
GBB Whisperer
|
I don't see why it wouldn't.
|
August 31st, 2007, 22:24 | #30 |
TK made specifically 4.3 ones, the difference being that the MEU grip specifically made for the 4.3 lacked the notch on the right side for the 5.1's ambidex safety. So you can put the 5.1 MEU grip on the 4.3 but not the other way around, though that hardly matters since I challenge you to find a place with the 4.3 version still in stock... Seriously, if anyone finds one, post it it up.
__________________
"The Bird of Hermes is My Name, Eating My Wings to Make Me Tame." |
|
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
|
|