|
|||||||||
|
Home | Forums | Register | Gallery | FAQ | Calendar |
Retailers | Community | News/Info | International Retailers | IRC | Today's Posts |
|
Thread Tools |
December 26th, 2008, 15:15 | #1 |
Which stock gun is better?
Maruzen Type 96
Tanaka M24 (I have The CA version) Or, the Tanaka M40a1 I need your guy's opinions because I can purchase another sniper rifle with my christmas money from the family. |
|
December 26th, 2008, 17:52 | #2 |
If you have a CA24 why don't you just upgrade that (assuming you haven't) or buy an AEG?
|
|
December 26th, 2008, 18:08 | #3 |
Just upgrade the CA M24 bud. You'll enjoy the consistancy of it once you get all the right parts inside. I've heard that gas guns, if you live in a place where the temperature varies a lot, you'll have inconsistant shots. The CA m24 is a beast as far as durability goes. Dont underestimate it and just give it the upgrades it needs. the Maruzen L96 is basically the same, uses the APS-2 system. There would be no point of buying it aside from looks. and to be quite honest. L96's are getting overdone
________ Ship Sale Last edited by Strelok; April 11th, 2011 at 12:22.. |
|
December 26th, 2008, 19:40 | #4 |
Thanks guys, I think i'll buy the maruzen L96 since I live in WI, and i'll try to get more upgrades for the CA. The reason buying the upgrades may be impossible because my friend said he needed 50$ to get the CA M24 (He copies every gun and all the upgrades I get but he lives far away from me so I don't see him much) so i'm trying to help him out.
|
|
December 26th, 2008, 19:45 | #5 | |
Quote:
________ Kids Avandia Last edited by Strelok; April 11th, 2011 at 12:22.. |
||
December 27th, 2008, 11:39 | #6 |
As of the 26th I ordered the maruzen, upgrades may come later.
|
|
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
|
|