|
|||||||||
|
Home | Forums | Register | Gallery | FAQ | Calendar |
Retailers | Community | News/Info | International Retailers | IRC | Today's Posts |
|
Thread Tools |
April 29th, 2007, 23:27 | #46 |
What, you get hit with an improper subnet, or get erroneously filtered by a firewall?
__________________
"Anyone with a name like Amanishourbariki should give a few letters to the poor Ng family." - Snarfangel, Fark.com |
|
April 30th, 2007, 00:49 | #47 |
Delierious Designer of Dastardly Detonations
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: in the dark recesses of some metal chip filled machine shop
|
Development is going very well. I passed a major milestone today with a new model. Same operating principles that I've been working with the last one, but with parts which are much more manufacturable. The last one was a good functional proof of concept, but it was a fussy thing with too many parts. I'm at something which is pretty close to a manufacturable design now. Development is far enough that it's time to push through patent filings and talk to injection mould makers.
Unfortunately I won't be making any public releases until moulds are nearly completed. I really don't like long product launches. They can become a disappointing fizzle if I run into technical difficulties like moulding difficulties which set back release dates a month or so. I really don't like engineering to a deadline set by marketing. I'm giddy with excitement because this is a very close look at the final build. No idea when it'll be ready, but I expect moulds to take at least 6wks to machine not to mention I have to raise the finances to start them.
__________________
Want nearly free GBB gas? |
April 30th, 2007, 04:15 | #48 |
oohh man lengthy prosess but it shall be well worth it im pretty excited
-Phil |
|
June 8th, 2007, 17:57 | #49 |
Madmax, still going? Or running into snags?
|
|
June 8th, 2007, 19:35 | #50 |
Not Eye Safe, Pretty Boy Maximus on the field take his picture!
|
i completely agree what scarecrow stated on the first page.
inexpensive one time use durable enough to throw and not have it fall apart on impact re-useable grenades are typically expensive and a hassle to find after throwing, not to mention they can get STOLEN, it's aggrivating enough losing mags. the Lance co grenades have so far been the best I've seen, they didnt spread BBs very well but they're still the best for effectiveness (if it lands in a bunker or vehicle your all dead anyway) |
June 8th, 2007, 20:48 | #51 | |
Delierious Designer of Dastardly Detonations
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: in the dark recesses of some metal chip filled machine shop
|
Still chugging along. Functional prototypes are working well, but I'm making refinements for manufacturability.
Quote:
Really the key difficulty is making something effective and cheap enough to be single use without pyro.
__________________
Want nearly free GBB gas? |
|
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
|
|