THIS is ironic...

[Spas-Tick22]

this is retarded, our guys dont have guns...but what is probably more retarded is the americans would let some armed guy cross there boarder. hell there guards are armed to the teeth (trust me i just came over thew aldergrove on today and had to stop in the american office, M4's line a whole wall, and EVERY guard has a Sig strapped to there belt with a vest on, even the guys ion the stations that let you through have rifles, y the hell is there so much of a ruckus? all we need to do is put up some sort of barrier (like bear claws in the road that are remote controlled) and leave it to the americans to shoot up.

[BC_K]

Originally Posted by Spas-Tick22

this is retarded, our guys dont have guns...but what is probably more retarded is the americans would let some armed guy cross there boarder. hell there guards are armed to the teeth (trust me i just came over thew aldergrove on today and had to stop in the american office, M4's line a whole wall, and EVERY guard has a Sig strapped to there belt with a vest on, even the guys ion the stations that let you through have rifles, y the hell is there so much of a ruckus? all we need to do is put up some sort of barrier (like bear claws in the road that are remote controlled) and leave it to the americans to shoot up.

Interesting, last time I went through that crossing, yes there were M4's but the U.S. customs agents were packing .40 S&W Beretta 96's, not Sig's. When did this happen!!!! Sigs are ugly! At least with the Beretta I got something to look at on my way over. :lol:

[Luckyorwhat]

Originally Posted by Shugart

How the hell did you connect arming retards with Communism?

So you'd let a paranoid schzo run around with a Mac 10 because NOT allowing him to have one makes the country communist...

No, you don't understand, I'm agreeing with you. C.B.S. employees are most likely suffering either mental disorders or sub-average intelligence, and thus you and I, jerkoffs on an airsoft forum, we're more qualified to judge what's best for them. The fact that disarming them is fundamentally wrong on three distinct levels, well we can ignore that, because under the liberal ideology armed=bad & disarmed=good, and that's the final word. Once everyone learns those equations there will be no need for 'independent rational thought', one can only look forward to the day...

[Combine]

Telsa Coils, thats the awnser.

One guy tries to do something funny and pulls a gun, Zzzap, fried.

Anyone who is paid to protect YOU, or the country we live in, should be entitled to protect themselves. PERIOD.

Or are you satisfied with the idea of armed criminals meeting unarmed resistance?

Originally Posted by thephenom

If a terrorists or some known criminals were driving across the borders, would their cars be the biggest weapons instead of some small tiny 9mm?

If that was the case, a border guard carrying a glock would be pretty useless. Perhaps they should be issued RPGs? :???:

Have you ever even HELD a Glock? Fired a .40?

Is it acceptable to ignore multiple scenarios where arming border guards is appropriate due to the innefectiveness of the control against a select few of those scenarios? Of course not.

Hundreds of thousands of handguns are worn every day on the street, and surprisingly, we aren't stepping over dead bodies. They're worn by police officers and armed guards, who generally have far LESS training and experience than your average target-shooting civillian. Cops aren't supermen or superwomen, they're people just like everyone else. If they can be trained to safely carry a firearm, and certified to do so, why can't a border guard who swore the same oath as that police officer?